![]() |
Variance in Sports Betting
We all want to win at sports betting. If we didn't expect to win, we wouldn't do it. If you didn't expect me to help you win, you wouldn't hire me to provide advice. And, you should expect to win with my picks. But let me qualify that. You should expect to win over the long haul. Over the short term, anything can and does happen. Does that mean you can't win with me short term? Absolutely not. In fact, it's a more likely outcome, even over the short term, than losing. But, in the short term, there is going to be a lot of variance. What is Variance?
What kind of variance should we expect in betting sports?
Smaller numbers = higher variance Think of it this way. If we flip a coin, we expect to see heads 50% of the time and tails 50% of the time. If we flip a coin 3500 times, we would expect to be very close to 1750 heads and 1750 tails. It would be extremely rare, with 3500 "trials" to vary far from that. But if we flip it 200 times, we are much more likely to vary from the expected 100 heads and 100 tails. It would not be unreasonable to see 60% heads on 200 trials. Another way to think about this is to compare it to diversification in the stock market. If you index (buy every stock in the market), your yearly return will be relatively stable. But if you load everything you have into just a few stocks, your returns will be much more variable (you can win or lose a lot).
Variance in sports performance Dwight Howard is one of the best NBA players in history at hitting shots. He makes 57.8% of his shots. And, if we had to guess what his shooting percentage will be over the next month, or the next week or even the next game, we would be wise to guess around 58%. But, the reality is that his shooting percentage could vary greatly from that expected number, especially over small samples. And of course that is what we see. In the 2010-11 regular season, in the 78 regular-season games in which he played, Howard's field goal percent per-game ranged from .250 to 1.000. He had games in during the season in which he went:
He halso had games in which he went:
In early December, Howard had a stretch of four games in which he shot a combined 28-for-58 (48%). Does that mean that he's a 48% shooter? No, it means he was off for a stretch of about 60 shots but that long term he'll be around 58%. Ray Allen, one of the best long-range shooters of all time finished the 2008/09 playoffs with a 8-game stretch in which he went 38-for-107 (35.5%). In 2007/08, the Celtics beat the Lakers for the NBA Championship. In the playoffs that year, Allen had an 11-game stretch in which he went 40-for-116. That's 34.5%, which was 24% below his career average. Is this strange to see these great shooters perform miserably? Not really. Over the course of a long career, every great shooter is going to go on some awful runs. The same thing will happen in sports betting. So, just as elite shooters like Dwight Howard and Ray Allen will have short-term stretches where they vastly under-perform (and over-perform) their average, we will see the same thing in sports betting. And this is 100% normal. It's due to variance (a statisticaly certainty) and it cannot be avoided. It simply has to be understood and accepted.
So why bet sports?
Can you handle the truth? You can mitigate the affects of variance by playing more games. Over a small sample (for example, 100 games), the variance will be high. Over a large sample (say 3000+ games), the variance will be much, much lower. So if your expected outcome is positive (over 52.4% for regular straight sports bets), it's always better to play as many games as possible. This will let the true value shine (vs. the short term which has a lot to due with luck). If you can get to the point where you can truly understand and emotionally cope with the concepts above, you can do very well in sports betting. Just remember, it's easier said than done!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||